Revision: spettatore-egiziano_0029.jpg

HTML

Slavery

To date, economists have deplored the useless efforts of the European powers to destroy slavery. Despite the established treaties, and the voyages that are maintained to impede on human bodies being sold on the market as any other commodity, the African continent loses more than 400 thousand people from this traffic, those of who are transported to the opposite regions of America. And again despite the principles that dictated those treaties, one instigates/fuels and lends a hand in a way to a similar market for part of these same people who took away their voice. Whatever the intentions are, it is a sure and undeniable fact that in him there is a serious lack of consequence. But this inconsequence is natural and complies to the abnormal state in which it lives, and it has upset society for some time (CHECK THIS). In the terrible material and moral fight between power and law, between the spirit of the old society and the principles that should enliven a new one, the truth is felt. From it, the parties at war would like to deduce it from the conjectures of self-interest/benefit, they would like to bend it to their different concerns, they would like to fit it to their own shape, and what outcome do you hope for from this bastard admittance/transplant? Without reality in the truth, this is no more than distorted appearances, and in its application, the usual loyalty from which emanates, the principles of liberty and brotherhood are owing in the humanitarian work. Inconsequence, therefore, will last as long as this fight does, and until the entire society shows itself to be tired of this war and wants to rest in the shade of a lasting peace, not a deceitful peace. I will not say how the voyages from the other side of this continent have only made the commodity of human bodies more expensive awaited the dangers that go towards those who profit; I will only mention/hint at only one consequence that this market has in common with the one that we see Europeans doing under our own eyes, and this is the mortality of the purchased slaves due to diseases that develop from the influence of new climate and temperatures opposite those of their natural regions. This consequence is very well proven by science; and when other regions lack/fall short, this one that should shake every principle of humanity should bring European powers to quickly take appropriate action to rid the evil from its roots. I was saying that underneath out eyes this market is instigated. And in reality, who could ever believe that an effective way to destroy slavery today is to buy ten blacks, then after a few months buy another one, then more, and little by little declare those that you bought to be free? Will the despicable market not exist forever with this method? Is it not, like I was saying, instigating it instead? Now having been shown the same fact that through this way, slavery cannot be destroyed, what other goal can one have in similar work that, on the one hand maintains the market more active than ever, and on the other prematurely sacrifices many human lives, that from their extremely hot lands are taken on a voyage through the freezing climate of the north? If one wants to suggest the goal of education, this moral work is opposed by the immorality of certain harm/offenses, and by problematic advantages. Certain damages are